Art Direct Tennis Betting: Lesson 3 - Seeding
Learn how to make money from ATP tennis in this guide for tournament action.
In basic terms, they plant a particular tennis tournament (World Tour Grand Slam 250) are the same, simple guideline.The assembled of players - be it 28, 32, 48, 64, etc. - are listed in order of ranking world and seeded, then given in descending order, until the number of seeds is determined. Thus, the greatest player in the world rankings is the No. 1 seed, followed by module No.2, No.3 and so on.The is usually the seeds No.1 and No.3 can be placed on top of the draw , No. 2 and No.. bottom four seeds. The remaining seeds are distributed evenly to provide a framework around which to draw any other conclusion.
It is not rocket science (and the floor is completely open to interpretation, tournament organizers from time to time), but it is something that everyone should know about tennis champion - even if not many areHowever, blind acceptance of these choices of seeded final bets are very risky strategy. They take little or nothing in its current form, surface texture, and the rest of the players in the draw (this may be the top seed of the other seeds to avoid a QF or SF, but may still face tough opponents in the opening rounds) . And the statistics suggest strongly that the No. 1 seed not to win many tournaments as perhaps think.In first 20 tournaments, winning in 2010 the ratio / Seeds were: - No. 1 (4), No 2 (4), No. 3 (5), No.4 and No.5 (0) No 6 (1), No 7 (0), No. 8 (1) and seeded (5). That's right, only 4 / 20 (or 20%) of the winners of the ATP Tour were seeded, but it is interesting to note 5.20 (or 25%) was seeded.
Example: Feliciano Lopez (Johannesburg 2010) 8/1The WON Spanish was the No. 3 seed in South Africa - statistically the most successful seed - and its success has added further evidence that the argument that not all No seed should be considered the winner of a tournament infallible. In fact, by the numbers, they are more likely to win than any other to seeds.And while it is the sense of believing the No. 1 seed is the best player in the draw (which is the highest in the world ranking) and if the player is more likely to win, is too simplistic a method on which to base a selection of Paris strategy.In pure and simple, the series heads to be taken for illustrative purposes only and nothing else - after all How many times is not the market leader No. 1 seed. And if you do not see gambling as the most likely winner, why?
Pictures/SnapShot :
In basic terms, they plant a particular tennis tournament (World Tour Grand Slam 250) are the same, simple guideline.The assembled of players - be it 28, 32, 48, 64, etc. - are listed in order of ranking world and seeded, then given in descending order, until the number of seeds is determined. Thus, the greatest player in the world rankings is the No. 1 seed, followed by module No.2, No.3 and so on.The is usually the seeds No.1 and No.3 can be placed on top of the draw , No. 2 and No.. bottom four seeds. The remaining seeds are distributed evenly to provide a framework around which to draw any other conclusion.
It is not rocket science (and the floor is completely open to interpretation, tournament organizers from time to time), but it is something that everyone should know about tennis champion - even if not many areHowever, blind acceptance of these choices of seeded final bets are very risky strategy. They take little or nothing in its current form, surface texture, and the rest of the players in the draw (this may be the top seed of the other seeds to avoid a QF or SF, but may still face tough opponents in the opening rounds) . And the statistics suggest strongly that the No. 1 seed not to win many tournaments as perhaps think.In first 20 tournaments, winning in 2010 the ratio / Seeds were: - No. 1 (4), No 2 (4), No. 3 (5), No.4 and No.5 (0) No 6 (1), No 7 (0), No. 8 (1) and seeded (5). That's right, only 4 / 20 (or 20%) of the winners of the ATP Tour were seeded, but it is interesting to note 5.20 (or 25%) was seeded.
Example: Feliciano Lopez (Johannesburg 2010) 8/1The WON Spanish was the No. 3 seed in South Africa - statistically the most successful seed - and its success has added further evidence that the argument that not all No seed should be considered the winner of a tournament infallible. In fact, by the numbers, they are more likely to win than any other to seeds.And while it is the sense of believing the No. 1 seed is the best player in the draw (which is the highest in the world ranking) and if the player is more likely to win, is too simplistic a method on which to base a selection of Paris strategy.In pure and simple, the series heads to be taken for illustrative purposes only and nothing else - after all How many times is not the market leader No. 1 seed. And if you do not see gambling as the most likely winner, why?
Pictures/SnapShot :
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments
0 comments:
Post a Comment